Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research

Georgia State University · Drexel University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

The issue of whether IS positivist researchers were sufficiently validating their instruments was initially raised fifteen years ago and rigor in IS research is still one of the most critical scientific issues facing the field. Without solid validation of the instruments that are used to gather data on which findings and interpretations are based, the very scientific basis of the profession is threatened. This study builds on four prior retrospectives of IS research that conclude that IS positivist researchers continue to face major barriers in instrument, statistical, and other forms of validation. It goes beyond these studies by offering analyses of the state-of-the-art of research validities and deriving…

Citation impact

2,766
total citations
FWCI
41.00
Percentile
100%
References
163
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Heuristics
  • Positivism
  • Construct (python library)
  • Construct validity
  • Reliability (semiconductor)
  • Face validity
  • Management science
  • Face (sociological concept)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.