Abstract
Qualitative synthesis informs important aspects of evidence-based healthcare, particularly within the practical decision-making contexts that health professionals work in. Of the qualitative methodologies available for synthesis, meta-aggregation is most transparently aligned with accepted conventions for the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews. Meta-aggregation is philosophically grounded in pragmatism and transcendental phenomenology. The essential characteristics of a meta-aggregative review are that the reviewer avoids re-interpretation of included studies, but instead accurately and reliably presents the findings of the included studies as intended by the original authors. This study reports on the…
Citation impact
2,231
total citations
- FWCI
- 21.11
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 22
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Pragmatism
- Systematic review
- Qualitative research
- Management science
- Interpretation (philosophy)
- Transcendental number
- Computer science
- Epistemology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.