articleBMJJun 17, 2004GREEN OA

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Users of clinical practice guidelines and other recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the recommendations. Systematic and explicit methods of making judgments can reduce errors and improve communication. We have developed a system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts. In this article we present a summary of our approach from the perspective of a guideline user. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation require consideration of the balance between benefits and harms, the quality of the evidence, translation of the evidence into specific circumstances, and the certainty of…

Citation impact

8,435
total citations
FWCI
119.03
Percentile
100%
References
48
Citations per year

Authors

27

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Grading (engineering)
  • Quality of evidence
  • Risk analysis (engineering)
  • Computer science
  • Certainty
  • Guideline
  • Psychological intervention
  • Quality (philosophy)
No related works found for this paper.