reviewCritical CareJun 12, 2015GOLD OA

Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis

King's College London · King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Introduction

Although rapid response system teams have been widely adopted by many health systems, their effectiveness in reducing hospital mortality is uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the impact of rapid response teams on hospital mortality and cardiopulmonary arrest. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1, 1990, through 31 December 2013, using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and the Cochrane Library. We included studies that reported data on the primary outcomes of ICU and in-hospital mortality or cardiopulmonary arrests.

Results

Twenty-nine eligible studies were identified. The studies were analysed in groups based on adult and paediatric trials that were further sub-grouped on methodological design. There were 5 studies that were considered either cluster randomized control trial, controlled before after or interrupted time series. The remaining studies were before and after studies without a contemporaneous control. The implementation of RRS has been associated with an overall reduction in hospital mortality in both the adult (RR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.81-0.95, p

Citation impact

600
total citations
FWCI
28.43
Percentile
100%
References
65
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • CINAHL
  • Rapid response team
  • Emergency medicine
  • Meta-analysis
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • MEDLINE
  • Relative risk
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.