reviewObesity ReviewsNov 23, 2011Closed access

Waist‐to‐height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Oxford Brookes University · Ashwell Museum

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Our aim was to differentiate the screening potential of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist circumference (WC) for adult cardiometabolic risk in people of different nationalities and to compare both with body mass index (BMI). We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that used receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for assessing the discriminatory power of anthropometric indices in distinguishing adults with hypertension, type-2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, metabolic syndrome and general cardiovascular outcomes (CVD). Thirty one papers met the inclusion criteria. Using data on all outcomes, averaged within study group, WHtR had significantly greater discriminatory power compared…

Citation impact

2,066
total citations
FWCI
61.83
Percentile
100%
References
68
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Waist-to-height ratio
  • Waist
  • Medicine
  • Body mass index
  • Meta-analysis
  • Anthropometry
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Circumference
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.