articleHealth Services ResearchMar 11, 2008BRONZE OA

Assessing Validity of ICD‐9‐CM and ICD‐10 Administrative Data in Recording Clinical Conditions in a Unique Dually Coded Database

University of Calgary · Alberta Health Services · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

The goal of this study was to assess the validity of the International Classification of Disease, 10th Version (ICD-10) administrative hospital discharge data and to determine whether there were improvements in the validity of coding for clinical conditions compared with ICD-9 Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) data.

Methods

We reviewed 4,008 randomly selected charts for patients admitted from January 1 to June 30, 2003 at four teaching hospitals in Alberta, Canada to determine the presence or absence of 32 clinical conditions and to assess the agreement between ICD-10 data and chart data. We then re-coded the same charts using ICD-9-CM and determined the agreement between the ICD-9-CM data and chart data for recording those same conditions. The accuracy of ICD-10 data relative to chart data was compared with the accuracy of ICD-9-CM data relative to chart data.

Citation impact

889
total citations
FWCI
34.66
Percentile
100%
References
27
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • ICD-10
  • Chart
  • Positive predicative value
  • Database
  • Statistics
  • Predictive value
  • Internal medicine
No related works found for this paper.

Funding