articleBloodMay 19, 2015BRONZE OA

International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts

Université Paris Cité · Hôpital Saint-Louis · +22 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluated azacitidine efficacy and safety vs conventional care regimens (CCRs) in 488 patients age ≥65 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with >30% bone marrow blasts. Before randomization, a CCR (standard induction chemotherapy, low-dose ara-c, or supportive care only) was preselected for each patient. Patients then were assigned 1:1 to azacitidine (n = 241) or CCR (n = 247). Patients assigned to CCR received their preselected treatment. Median overall survival (OS) was increased with azacitidine vs CCR: 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-12.7 months) vs 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.0-8.6 months), respectively (hazard ratio [HR]…

Citation impact

1,144
total citations
FWCI
64.76
Percentile
100%
References
28
Citations per year

Authors

24

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Azacitidine
  • Medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Hypomethylating agent
  • Phases of clinical research
  • Complete remission
  • Oncology
  • Clinical trial
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.