The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review
Hubei University of Medicine · Wuhan University · +5 more institutions
Abstract
To systematically review the methodological assessment tools for pre-clinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline.
We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers Manual, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) up to May 20th, 2014. Two authors selected studies and extracted data; quantitative analysis was performed to summarize the characteristics of included tools.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 168.87
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 98
Authors
8- XZXian‐Tao Zeng
Hubei University of Medicine, Wuhan University, Taihe Hospital, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- YZYonggang Zhang
Sichuan University, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
- JSJoey S.W. Kwong
Sichuan University, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
- CZChao Zhang
Hubei University of Medicine, Taihe Hospital
- SLSheng Li
Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Topics & keywords
- Systematic review
- Critical appraisal
- Checklist
- Medicine
- Guideline
- Randomized controlled trial
- Psychological intervention
- Clinical study design