articleJAMAFeb 8, 2005Closed access

Ximelagatran vs Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Stanford Medicine

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran with warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial (2000-2001) conducted at 409 North American sites, involving 3922 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and additional stroke risk factors. INTERVENTIONS: Adjusted-dose warfarin (aiming for an international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0 to 3.0) or fixed-dose oral ximelagatran, 36 mg twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was all strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolic events. The primary analysis was based on demonstrating noninferiority within an absolute margin of 2.0% per year according to the intention-to-treat model.

Results

During 6405 patient-years (mean 20 months) of follow-up, 88 patients experienced primary events. The mean (SD) INR with warfarin (2.4 [0.8]) was within target during 68% of the treatment period. The primary event rate with ximelagatran was 1.6% per year and with warfarin was 1.2% per year (absolute difference, 0.45% per year; 95% confidence interval, -0.13% to 1.03% per year; P

Citation impact

664
total citations
FWCI
49.60
Percentile
100%
References
25
Citations per year

Authors

11

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Ximelagatran
  • Warfarin
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Stroke (engine)
  • Confidence interval
  • Clinical endpoint
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding