articleAmerican Journal of Political ScienceOct 8, 2013Closed access

China's Strategic Censorship

University of California, Berkeley

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

While it is often assumed that authoritarian regimes inevitably fear and restrict media independence, permitting watchdog journalism can actually help such regimes maintain power by improving governance. Yet such a strategy risks facilitating a coordinated uprising if discontent is revealed to be widespread. A formal model shows that under some conditions, a regime optimally permits investigative reporting on lower‐level officialdom, adjusting how much reporting is allowed depending on the level of underlying social tensions. This strategy yields many of the benefits of free media without risking overthrow. An extension shows why an increase in uncontrollable information, such as from the Internet, may result…

Citation impact

609
total citations
FWCI
61.14
Percentile
100%
References
66
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Authoritarianism
  • Censorship
  • Freedom of the press
  • China
  • Independence (probability theory)
  • Corporate governance
  • Political science
  • Social media
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.