articleBritish journal of surgeryNov 6, 2012BRONZE OA

Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer

University of Leeds · St James's University Hospital

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic resection is used widely in the management of colorectal cancer; however, the data on long-term outcomes, particularly those related to rectal cancer, are limited. The results of long-term follow-up of the UK Medical Research Council trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer are presented.

Methods

A total of 794 patients from 27 UK centres were randomized to laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio between 1996 and 2002. Long-term follow-up data were analysed to determine differences in survival outcomes and recurrences for intention-to-treat and actual treatment groups.

Citation impact

670
total citations
FWCI
22.50
Percentile
100%
References
26
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Hazard ratio
  • Interquartile range
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Confidence interval
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Cancer
  • Surgery
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding