Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer
University of Leeds · St James's University Hospital
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic resection is used widely in the management of colorectal cancer; however, the data on long-term outcomes, particularly those related to rectal cancer, are limited. The results of long-term follow-up of the UK Medical Research Council trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer are presented.
Methods
A total of 794 patients from 27 UK centres were randomized to laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio between 1996 and 2002. Long-term follow-up data were analysed to determine differences in survival outcomes and recurrences for intention-to-treat and actual treatment groups.
Citation impact
670
total citations
- FWCI
- 22.50
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 26
Citations per year
Authors
7Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Medicine
- Hazard ratio
- Interquartile range
- Colorectal cancer
- Confidence interval
- Randomized controlled trial
- Cancer
- Surgery
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.