articleJournal of Neurosurgery SpineSep 1, 2010Closed access

Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale

NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · Cornell University · +10 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

The evolution of imaging techniques, along with highly effective radiation options has changed the way metastatic epidural tumors are treated. While high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) frequently serves as an indication for surgical decompression, no consensus exists in the literature about the precise definition of this term. The advancement of the treatment paradigms in patients with metastatic tumors for the spine requires a clear grading scheme of ESCC. The degree of ESCC often serves as a major determinant in the decision to operate or irradiate. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of a 6-point, MR imaging-based grading system for ESCC.

Methods

To determine the reliability of the grading scale, a survey was distributed to 7 spine surgeons who participate in the Spine Oncology Study Group. The MR images of 25 cervical or thoracic spinal tumors were distributed consisting of 1 sagittal image and 3 axial images at the identical level including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted images. The survey was administered 3 times at 2-week intervals. The inter- and intrarater reliability was assessed.

Citation impact

707
total citations
FWCI
6.07
Percentile
100%
References
20
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Intra-rater reliability
  • Spinal cord
  • Grading (engineering)
  • Sagittal plane
  • Reliability (semiconductor)
  • Grading scale
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.