Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · Cornell University · +10 more institutions
Abstract
The evolution of imaging techniques, along with highly effective radiation options has changed the way metastatic epidural tumors are treated. While high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) frequently serves as an indication for surgical decompression, no consensus exists in the literature about the precise definition of this term. The advancement of the treatment paradigms in patients with metastatic tumors for the spine requires a clear grading scheme of ESCC. The degree of ESCC often serves as a major determinant in the decision to operate or irradiate. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of a 6-point, MR imaging-based grading system for ESCC.
To determine the reliability of the grading scale, a survey was distributed to 7 spine surgeons who participate in the Spine Oncology Study Group. The MR images of 25 cervical or thoracic spinal tumors were distributed consisting of 1 sagittal image and 3 axial images at the identical level including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted images. The survey was administered 3 times at 2-week intervals. The inter- and intrarater reliability was assessed.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 20
Authors
10- MHMark H. BilskyCorresponding
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, Cornell University, Faculty of 1000 (United States), Neurological Surgery
- ILIlya Laufer
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, Cornell University, Neurological Surgery
- DRDaryl R. Fourney
University of Saskatchewan
- MWMichael W. Groff
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- MHMeic H. Schmidt
University of Utah
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Spinal cord compression
- Intra-rater reliability
- Spinal cord
- Grading (engineering)
- Sagittal plane
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- Grading scale
- Good health and well-being