Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines
University of Wisconsin–Madison · University of Illinois Chicago · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Marketing academics and practitioners frequently employ cross-sectional surveys. In recent years, editors, reviewers, and authors have expressed increasing concern about the validity of this approach. These validity concerns center on reducing common method variance bias and enhancing causal inferences. Longitudinal data collection is commonly offered as a solution to these problems. In this article, the authors conceptually examine the role of longitudinal surveys in addressing these validity concerns. Then, they provide an illustrative comparison of the validity of cross-sectional versus longitudinal surveys using two data sets and a Monte Carlo simulation. The conceptualization and findings suggest that…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 60.76
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 137
Authors
4Topics & keywords
- Conceptualization
- Longitudinal data
- Longitudinal study
- External validity
- Variance (accounting)
- Set (abstract data type)
- Cross-sectional study
- Psychology