articleJournal of Marketing ResearchMay 13, 2008Closed access

Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines

University of Wisconsin–Madison · University of Illinois Chicago · +2 more institutions

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Marketing academics and practitioners frequently employ cross-sectional surveys. In recent years, editors, reviewers, and authors have expressed increasing concern about the validity of this approach. These validity concerns center on reducing common method variance bias and enhancing causal inferences. Longitudinal data collection is commonly offered as a solution to these problems. In this article, the authors conceptually examine the role of longitudinal surveys in addressing these validity concerns. Then, they provide an illustrative comparison of the validity of cross-sectional versus longitudinal surveys using two data sets and a Monte Carlo simulation. The conceptualization and findings suggest that…

Citation impact

1,200
total citations
FWCI
60.76
Percentile
100%
References
137
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Conceptualization
  • Longitudinal data
  • Longitudinal study
  • External validity
  • Variance (accounting)
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Psychology
No related works found for this paper.