articleACM Transactions on Information SystemsJan 1, 2004Closed access

Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems

Oregon State University · University of Minnesota

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Recommender systems have been evaluated in many, often incomparable, ways. In this article, we review the key decisions in evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems: the user tasks being evaluated, the types of analysis and datasets being used, the ways in which prediction quality is measured, the evaluation of prediction attributes other than quality, and the user-based evaluation of the system as a whole. In addition to reviewing the evaluation strategies used by prior researchers, we present empirical results from the analysis of various accuracy metrics on one content domain where all the tested metrics collapsed roughly into three equivalence classes. Metrics within each equivalency class…

Citation impact

5,750
total citations
FWCI
331.80
Percentile
100%
References
74
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Computer science
  • Collaborative filtering
  • Recommender system
  • Equivalence (formal languages)
  • Uncorrelated
  • Class (philosophy)
  • Information retrieval
  • Key (lock)
No related works found for this paper.