articleThe Journal of PoliticsOct 11, 2007Closed access

Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · University of British Columbia · +1 more institution

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Scholars assume that citizens perform better when they know pertinent facts. Factual beliefs, however, become relevant for political judgments only when people interpret them. Interpretations provide opportunities for partisans to rationalize their existing opinions. Using panel studies, we examine whether and how partisans updated factual beliefs, interpretations of beliefs, and opinions about the handling of the Iraq war as real-world conditions changed. Most respondents held similar, fairly accurate beliefs about facts. But interpretations varied across partisan groups in predictable ways. In turn, interpretations, not beliefs, drove opinions. Perversely, the better informed more effectively used…

Citation impact

686
total citations
FWCI
39.89
Percentile
100%
References
18
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Politics
  • Motivated reasoning
  • Social psychology
  • Political science
  • Positive economics
  • Psychology
  • Interpretation (philosophy)
  • Epistemology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.