articleJournal of the American Statistical AssociationMay 16, 2006Closed access

Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons

Royal Society

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Randomized comparisons among several treatments give rise to an incomplete-blocks structure known as mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs). To analyze such data structures, it is crucial to assess whether the disparate evidence sources provide consistent information about the treatment contrasts. In this article we propose a general method for assessing evidence inconsistency in the framework of Bayesian hierarchical models. We begin with the distinction between basic parameters, which have prior distributions, and functional parameters, which are defined in terms of basic parameters. Based on a graphical analysis of MTC structures, evidence inconsistency is defined as a relation between a functional parameter…

Citation impact

766
total citations
FWCI
7.63
Percentile
100%
References
48
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Consistency (knowledge bases)
  • Computer science
  • Markov chain Monte Carlo
  • Bayesian probability
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Econometrics
  • Statistics
  • Data mining
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.