Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Eleven popular scoring functions have been tested on 100 protein-ligand complexes to evaluate their abilities to reproduce experimentally determined structures and binding affinities. They include four scoring functions implemented in the LigFit module in Cerius2 (LigScore, PLP, PMF, and LUDI), four scoring functions implemented in the CScore module in SYBYL (F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, and ChemScore), the scoring function implemented in the AutoDock program, and two stand-alone scoring functions (DrugScore and X-Score). These scoring functions are not tested in the context of a particular docking program. Instead, conformational sampling and scoring are separated into two consecutive steps. First, an…
Citation impact
851
total citations
- FWCI
- 32.39
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 29
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- AutoDock
- Docking (animal)
- Scoring rule
- Scoring system
- Chemistry
- Artificial intelligence
- Computer science
- Machine learning
No related works found for this paper.