articleJournal of Medicinal ChemistryMay 8, 2003Closed access

Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Eleven popular scoring functions have been tested on 100 protein-ligand complexes to evaluate their abilities to reproduce experimentally determined structures and binding affinities. They include four scoring functions implemented in the LigFit module in Cerius2 (LigScore, PLP, PMF, and LUDI), four scoring functions implemented in the CScore module in SYBYL (F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, and ChemScore), the scoring function implemented in the AutoDock program, and two stand-alone scoring functions (DrugScore and X-Score). These scoring functions are not tested in the context of a particular docking program. Instead, conformational sampling and scoring are separated into two consecutive steps. First, an…

Citation impact

851
total citations
FWCI
32.39
Percentile
100%
References
29
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • AutoDock
  • Docking (animal)
  • Scoring rule
  • Scoring system
  • Chemistry
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer science
  • Machine learning
No related works found for this paper.