reviewJournal of Applied PsychologyDec 27, 2011Closed access

Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison.

Texas A&M University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Much of the recent research on counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs) has used multi-item self-report measures of CWB. Because of concerns over self-report measurement, there have been recent calls to collect ratings of employees' CWB from their supervisors or coworkers (i.e., other-raters) as alternatives or supplements to self-ratings. However, little is still known about the degree to which other-ratings of CWB capture unique and valid incremental variance beyond self-report CWB. The present meta-analysis investigates a number of key issues regarding the incremental contribution of other-reports of CWB. First, self- and other-ratings of CWB were moderately to strongly correlated with each other. Second,…

Citation impact

613
total citations
FWCI
40.61
Percentile
100%
References
98
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Counterproductive work behavior
  • Psychology
  • Variance (accounting)
  • Meta-analysis
  • Social psychology
  • Work (physics)
  • Skepticism
  • Applied psychology
No related works found for this paper.