articleJournal of Clinical OncologyDec 27, 2011BRONZE OA

Summary Report on the Graded Prognostic Assessment: An Accurate and Facile Diagnosis-Specific Tool to Estimate Survival for Patients With Brain Metastases

University of Minnesota · Apple (Israel) · +14 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

A multi-institutional retrospective (1985 to 2007) database of 3,940 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with outcomes by primary site and treatment. Significant prognostic factors were used to define the diagnosis-specific GPA prognostic indices. A GPA of 4.0 correlates with the best prognosis, whereas a GPA of 0.0 corresponds with the worst prognosis.

Results

Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis. For lung cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score, age, presence of extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases, confirming the original Lung-GPA. For melanoma and renal cell cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score and the number of brain metastases. For breast cancer, prognostic factors were tumor subtype, Karnofsky performance score, and age. For GI cancer, the only prognostic factor was the Karnofsky performance score. The median survival times by GPA score and diagnosis were determined.

Citation impact

1,417
total citations
FWCI
42.65
Percentile
100%
References
21
Citations per year

Authors

22

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Karnofsky Performance Status
  • Lung cancer
  • Recursive partitioning
  • Oncology
  • Internal medicine
  • Multivariate analysis
  • Performance status
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.