articleStatistics SurveysJan 1, 2010DIAMOND OA

Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules

National Institutes of Health

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

In a mathematical approach to hypothesis tests, we start with a clearly defined set of hypotheses and choose the test with the best properties for those hypotheses. In practice, we often start with less precise hypotheses. For example, often a researcher wants to know which of two groups generally has the larger responses, and either a t-test or a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) test could be acceptable. Although both t-tests and WMW tests are usually associated with quite different hypotheses, the decision rule and p-value from either test could be associated with many different sets of assumptions, which we call perspectives. It is useful to have many of the different perspectives to which a decision rule may be…

Citation impact

1,108
total citations
FWCI
14.28
Percentile
100%
References
63
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Consistency (knowledge bases)
  • Test (biology)
  • Decision rule
  • Interpretation (philosophy)
  • Perspective (graphical)
  • Statistical hypothesis testing
  • Neutrality
  • Wilcoxon signed-rank test
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.