articleStrategic Management JournalMar 22, 2007Closed access

What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field

University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · Pennsylvania State University · +1 more institution

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Abstract It is commonly asserted that the field of strategic management is fragmented and lacks a coherent identity. This skepticism, however, is paradoxically at odds with the great success that strategic management has enjoyed. How might one explain this paradox? We seek answers to this question by relying first on a large‐scale survey of strategic management scholars from which we derive an implicit consensual definition of the field—as tacitly held by its members. We then supplement this implicit definition with an examination of the espoused definitions of the field obtained from a group of boundary‐spanning scholars. Our findings suggest that strategic management's success as a field emerges from an…

Citation impact

823
total citations
FWCI
55.18
Percentile
100%
References
97
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Optimal distinctiveness theory
  • Skepticism
  • Field (mathematics)
  • Strategic management
  • Odds
  • Identity (music)
  • Epistemology
  • Sociology
No related works found for this paper.

Funding