reviewJournal of Orthopaedic TraumaJul 29, 2005Closed access

Treatment of Acute Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Systematic Review of 2144 Fractures

University of Minnesota · University of Pittsburgh · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Fractures of the clavicle were reported to represent 2.6% of all fractures with an overall incidence of 64 per 100,000 per year (1987, Malmö, Sweden). Midshaft fractures account for approximately 69% to 81% of all clavicle fractures. Treatment options for acute midshaft clavicle fractures include nonoperative treatment (mostly sling or figure-of-eight bandage), open reduction and internal fixation with plates, and closed or open reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary pins, wires, or a nail. Most surgeons prefer nonoperative treatment of nondisplaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, the optimal treatment option for isolated acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures remains controversial.

Objectives

This study was designed to systematically summarize and compare results of different treatment options (nonoperative, operative extramedullary fixation, and operative intramedullary fixation) in the management of midshaft clavicle fractures, specifically for displaced fractures.

Citation impact

661
total citations
FWCI
7.93
Percentile
100%
References
23
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Clavicle
  • Intramedullary rod
  • Bandage
  • Surgery
  • Internal fixation
  • Fixation (population genetics)
  • Orthopedic surgery
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.