reviewJournal of Health Services Research & PolicyJan 1, 2005Closed access

Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods

University of Leicester · University of Liverpool

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The limitations of traditional forms of systematic review in making optimal use of all forms of evidence are increasingly evident, especially for policy-makers and practitioners. There is an urgent need for robust ways of incorporating qualitative evidence into systematic reviews.

Objectives

In this paper we provide a brief overview and critique of a selection of strategies for synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence, ranging from techniques that are largely qualitative and interpretive through to techniques that are largely quantitative and integrative.

Citation impact

2,025
total citations
FWCI
136.27
Percentile
100%
References
44
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Management science
  • Qualitative research
  • Thematic analysis
  • Systematic review
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Data science
  • Narrative
  • Qualitative comparative analysis
No related works found for this paper.

Funding