Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
University of Leicester · University of Liverpool
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Background
The limitations of traditional forms of systematic review in making optimal use of all forms of evidence are increasingly evident, especially for policy-makers and practitioners. There is an urgent need for robust ways of incorporating qualitative evidence into systematic reviews.
Objectives
In this paper we provide a brief overview and critique of a selection of strategies for synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence, ranging from techniques that are largely qualitative and interpretive through to techniques that are largely quantitative and integrative.
Citation impact
2,025
total citations
- FWCI
- 136.27
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 44
Citations per year
Authors
5Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Management science
- Qualitative research
- Thematic analysis
- Systematic review
- Strengths and weaknesses
- Data science
- Narrative
- Qualitative comparative analysis
No related works found for this paper.