A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?
Center for Assessment · James Madison University · +2 more institutions
Abstract
This meta-analysis addresses whether achievement goal researchers are using different labels for the same constructs or putting the same labels on different constructs. We systematically examined whether conceptual and methodological differences in the measurement of achievement goals moderated achievement goal intercorrelations and relationships with outcomes. We reviewed 243 correlational studies of self-reported achievement goals comprising a total of 91,087 participants. The items used to measure achievement goals were coded as being goal relevant (future-focused, cognitively represented, competence-related end states that the individual approaches or avoids) and were categorized according to the different…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 51.45
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 123
Authors
4Topics & keywords
- Psychology
- Goal orientation
- Competence (human resources)
- Goal setting
- Need for achievement
- Academic achievement
- Conceptual framework
- Scale (ratio)