Pooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias
The University of Melbourne · National Stroke Foundation · +1 more institution
Abstract
Systematic review and modified meta-analysis of studies of experimental stroke describing the efficacy of nicotinamide. The search strategy ensured ascertainment of studies published in full and those published in abstract only. DerSimonian and Laird random effects meta-analysis was used to account for heterogeneity between studies.
Nicotinamide improved outcome by 0.287 (95% confidence interval 0.227 to 0.347); it was more effective in temporary ischemia models, after intravenous administration, in animals without comorbidities, and in studies published in full rather than in abstract. Studies scoring highly on a quality measure gave more precise estimates of the global effect.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 31
Authors
4- MMMalcolm MacleodCorresponding
The University of Melbourne, National Stroke Foundation, University of Edinburgh
- TOTori O’Collins
The University of Melbourne, National Stroke Foundation, University of Edinburgh
- DWDavid W. Howells
The University of Melbourne, National Stroke Foundation, University of Edinburgh
- GAGeoffrey A. Donnan
The University of Melbourne, National Stroke Foundation, University of Edinburgh
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Neuroprotection
- Meta-analysis
- Stroke (engine)
- Confidence interval
- Pooling
- Clinical trial
- Publication bias