articleNew England Journal of MedicineNov 13, 2002Closed access

Reporting of Adverse Events

Harvard University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Tion to expand reporting of serious adverse events and medical errors, particularly mandatory re-porting, received the most attention and sparked con-troversy.2 The American Medical Association and the American Hospital Association raised strong objec-tions, claiming that mandatory reporting would in-crease liability and drive reporting underground.3 Clearly, the report struck a nerve. Although the response of the American Medical As-sociation reflected some confusion about the IOM’s advice — the call for mandatory reporting was di-rected at hospitals, not physicians — the discussion brought to the surface the unresolved conflict between the public’s desire for accountability and doctors ’ and hospitals ’ fear…

Citation impact

831
total citations
FWCI
51.79
Percentile
100%
References
26
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Confidentiality
  • Adverse effect
  • MEDLINE
  • Patient confidentiality
  • Work (physics)
  • Medical emergency
  • Risk analysis (engineering)
No related works found for this paper.