articleAmerican Journal of Public HealthMar 1, 2004GREEN OA

Evidence-Based Public Health: Moving Beyond Randomized Trials

Universidade Federal de Pelotas · Cornell University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evaluating the efficacy of clinical interventions, where the causal chain between the agent and the outcome is relatively short and simple and where results may be safely extrapolated to other settings. However, causal chains in public health interventions are complex, making RCT results subject to effect modification in different populations. Both the internal and external validity of RCT findings can be greatly enhanced by observational studies using adequacy or plausibility designs. For evaluating large-scale interventions, studies with plausibility designs are often the only feasible option and may provide valid evidence of impact. There is an urgent…

Citation impact

1,075
total citations
FWCI
103.59
Percentile
100%
References
28
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Observational study
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Psychological intervention
  • External validity
  • Internal validity
  • Medicine
  • Public health
  • Causal chain
No related works found for this paper.