articleJAMAJan 22, 2008Closed access

Androgen Suppression and Radiation vs Radiation Alone for Prostate Cancer

Brigham and Women's Hospital · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objectives

To compare 6 months of AST and radiation therapy (RT) to RT alone and to assess the interaction between level of comorbidity and all-cause mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: At academic and community-based medical centers in Massachusetts, between December 1, 1995, and April 15, 2001, 206 men with localized but unfavorable-risk prostate cancer were randomized to receive RT alone or RT and AST combined. All-cause mortality estimates stratified by randomized treatment group and further stratified in a postrandomization analysis by the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 comorbidity score were compared using a log-rank test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time to all-cause mortality.

Results

As of January 15, 2007, with a median follow-up of 7.6 (range, 0.5-11.0) years, 74 deaths have occurred. A significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (44 vs 30 deaths; hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.9; P = .01) was observed in men randomized to RT compared with RT and AST. However, the increased risk in all-cause mortality appeared to apply only to men randomized to RT with no or minimal comorbidity (31 vs 11 deaths; HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.1-8.5; P

Citation impact

689
total citations
FWCI
45.43
Percentile
100%
References
24
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Comorbidity
  • Hazard ratio
  • Internal medicine
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Prostate cancer
  • Confidence interval
  • Cancer
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.