articleNew England Journal of MedicineAug 22, 2002BRONZE OA

Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by Irradiation

University of Pittsburgh · NSABP Foundation

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

In women with breast cancer, the role of radical mastectomy, as compared with less extensive surgery, has been a matter of debate. We report 25-year findings of a randomized trial initiated in 1971 to determine whether less extensive surgery with or without radiation therapy was as effective as the Halsted radical mastectomy.

Methods

A total of 1079 women with clinically negative axillary nodes underwent radical mastectomy, total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation, or total mastectomy plus axillary dissection only if their nodes became positive. A total of 586 women with clinically positive axillary nodes either underwent radical mastectomy or underwent total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative-incidence estimates of outcome were obtained.

Citation impact

1,382
total citations
FWCI
16.36
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Mastectomy
  • Radical mastectomy
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Radiation therapy
  • Total Mastectomy
  • Breast cancer
  • Surgery
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding