Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by Irradiation
University of Pittsburgh · NSABP Foundation
Abstract
In women with breast cancer, the role of radical mastectomy, as compared with less extensive surgery, has been a matter of debate. We report 25-year findings of a randomized trial initiated in 1971 to determine whether less extensive surgery with or without radiation therapy was as effective as the Halsted radical mastectomy.
A total of 1079 women with clinically negative axillary nodes underwent radical mastectomy, total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation, or total mastectomy plus axillary dissection only if their nodes became positive. A total of 586 women with clinically positive axillary nodes either underwent radical mastectomy or underwent total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative-incidence estimates of outcome were obtained.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 16.36
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 22
Authors
6Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Mastectomy
- Radical mastectomy
- Randomized controlled trial
- Radiation therapy
- Total Mastectomy
- Breast cancer
- Surgery
- Good health and well-being
Funding
- WSWayne State University
- UOUniversity of Pennsylvania
- CUCreighton University
- UOUniversity of Pittsburgh
- UOUniversity of Rochester
- LSLouisiana State University
- TUTemple University
- JGJewish General Hospital
- UOUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- UOUniversity of California, San Diego
- SDSUNY Downstate Medical Center
- NCNational Cancer Institute