articleOrganizational Research MethodsMar 10, 2006Closed access

The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria

University of Georgia

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Everyone can recite methodological “urban legends” that were taught in graduate school, learned over the years through experience publishing, or perhaps just heard through the grapevine. In this article, the authors trace four widely cited and reported cutoff criteria to their (alleged) original sources to determine whether they really said what they are cited as having said about the cutoff criteria, and if not, what the original sources really said. The authors uncover partial truths in tracing the history of each cutoff criterion and in the end endorse a set of 12 specific guidelines for effective academic referencing provided by Harzing that, if adopted, should help prevent the further perpetuation of…

Citation impact

2,011
total citations
FWCI
44.62
Percentile
100%
References
131
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Cutoff
  • Publishing
  • TRACE (psycholinguistics)
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Epistemology
  • History
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Sustainable cities and communities
No related works found for this paper.