Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
University of Maryland, College Park · Max Planck Society · +1 more institution
Abstract
A popular distinction in cognitive and social psychology has been between intuitive and deliberate judgments. This juxtaposition has aligned in dual-process theories of reasoning associative, unconscious, effortless, heuristic, and suboptimal processes (assumed to foster intuitive judgments) versus rule-based, conscious, effortful, analytic, and rational processes (assumed to characterize deliberate judgments). In contrast, we provide convergent arguments and evidence for a unified theoretical approach to both intuitive and deliberative judgments. Both are rule-based, and in fact, the very same rules can underlie both intuitive and deliberate judgments. The important open question is that of rule selection,…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 20.95
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 162
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Heuristics
- Rationality
- Set (abstract data type)
- Heuristic
- Task (project management)
- Ecological rationality
- Cognition
- Cognitive psychology
- Life in Land