articlePsychological ReviewJan 1, 2011GREEN OA

Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.

University of Maryland, College Park · Max Planck Society · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

A popular distinction in cognitive and social psychology has been between intuitive and deliberate judgments. This juxtaposition has aligned in dual-process theories of reasoning associative, unconscious, effortless, heuristic, and suboptimal processes (assumed to foster intuitive judgments) versus rule-based, conscious, effortful, analytic, and rational processes (assumed to characterize deliberate judgments). In contrast, we provide convergent arguments and evidence for a unified theoretical approach to both intuitive and deliberative judgments. Both are rule-based, and in fact, the very same rules can underlie both intuitive and deliberate judgments. The important open question is that of rule selection,…

Citation impact

747
total citations
FWCI
20.95
Percentile
100%
References
162
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Heuristics
  • Rationality
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Heuristic
  • Task (project management)
  • Ecological rationality
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Life in Land
No related works found for this paper.