TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
University of California, Riverside · University of Wisconsin–Madison
Abstract
The primary rationale for the use of phylogenetically based statistical methods is that phylogenetic signal, the tendency for related species to resemble each other, is ubiquitous. Whether this assertion is true for a given trait in a given lineage is an empirical question, but general tools for detecting and quantifying phylogenetic signal are inadequately developed. We present new methods for continuous-valued characters that can be implemented with either phylogenetically independent contrasts or generalized least-squares models. First, a simple randomization procedure allows one to test the null hypothesis of no pattern of similarity among relatives. The test demonstrates correct Type I error rate at a…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 62.49
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 181
Authors
3Topics & keywords
- Phylogenetic tree
- Biology
- Type I and type II errors
- Phylogenetics
- Evolutionary biology
- Phylogenetic comparative methods
- Similarity (geometry)
- Statistical hypothesis testing
- Life in Land