Abstract
It has become common to reference “pi-stacking” forces or “pi–pi interactions” when describing the interactions between neighbouring aromatic rings. Here, we review experimental and theoretical literature across several fields and conclude that the terms “pi-stacking” and “pi–pi interactions” do not accurately describe the forces that drive association between aromatic molecules of the types most commonly studied in chemistry or biology laboratories. We therefore propose that these terms are misleading and should no longer be used. Even without these terms, electrostatic considerations relating to polarized pi systems, as described by Hunter and Sanders, have provided a good qualitative starting place for…
Citation impact
1,636
total citations
- FWCI
- 73.74
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 130
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Stacking
- Pi
- Solvation
- Pi interaction
- Molecule
- Work (physics)
- Computational chemistry
- Electrostatics
No related works found for this paper.