articleJan 1, 2008Closed access

An experimental comparison of click position-bias models

Microsoft (United States) · Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Search engine click logs provide an invaluable source of relevance information, but this information is biased. A key source of bias is presentation order: the probability of click is influenced by a document's position in the results page. This paper focuses on explaining that bias, modelling how probability of click depends on position. We propose four simple hypotheses about how position bias might arise. We carry out a large data-gathering effort, where we perturb the ranking of a major search engine, to see how clicks are affected. We then explore which of the four hypotheses best explains the real-world position effects, and compare these to a simple logistic regression model. The data are not well…

Citation impact

953
total citations
FWCI
112.02
Percentile
100%
References
9
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Computer science
  • Position (finance)
  • Ranking (information retrieval)
  • Presentation (obstetrics)
  • Relevance (law)
  • Simple (philosophy)
  • Rank (graph theory)
  • Information retrieval
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.