articleEpidemiologyMay 1, 2003Closed access

Quantifying Biases in Causal Models: Classical Confounding vs Collider-Stratification Bias

University of California, Los Angeles

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

It has long been known that stratifying on variables affected by the study exposure can create selection bias. More recently it has been shown that stratifying on a variable that precedes exposure and disease can induce confounding, even if there is no confounding in the unstratified (crude) estimate. This paper examines the relative magnitudes of these biases under some simple causal models in which the stratification variable is graphically depicted as a collider (a variable directly affected by two or more other variables in the graph). The results suggest that bias from stratifying on variables affected by exposure and disease may often be comparable in size with bias from classical confounding (bias from…

Citation impact

818
total citations
FWCI
5.31
Percentile
100%
References
30
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Confounding
  • Collider
  • Selection bias
  • Stratification (seeds)
  • Information bias
  • Omitted-variable bias
  • Statistics
  • Econometrics
No related works found for this paper.