reviewScienceApr 22, 2010Closed access

Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse

Stanford University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Argument and debate are common in science, yet they are virtually absent from science education. Recent research shows, however, that opportunities for students to engage in collaborative discourse and argumentation offer a means of enhancing student conceptual understanding and students' skills and capabilities with scientific reasoning. As one of the hallmarks of the scientist is critical, rational skepticism, the lack of opportunities to develop the ability to reason and argue scientifically would appear to be a significant weakness in contemporary educational practice. In short, knowing what is wrong matters as much as knowing what is right. This paper presents a summary of the main features of this body…

Citation impact

921
total citations
FWCI
193.07
Percentile
100%
References
41
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Argumentation theory
  • Skepticism
  • Argument (complex analysis)
  • Epistemology
  • Sociology
  • Science education
  • Engineering ethics
  • Pedagogy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.