Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Argument and debate are common in science, yet they are virtually absent from science education. Recent research shows, however, that opportunities for students to engage in collaborative discourse and argumentation offer a means of enhancing student conceptual understanding and students' skills and capabilities with scientific reasoning. As one of the hallmarks of the scientist is critical, rational skepticism, the lack of opportunities to develop the ability to reason and argue scientifically would appear to be a significant weakness in contemporary educational practice. In short, knowing what is wrong matters as much as knowing what is right. This paper presents a summary of the main features of this body…
Citation impact
921
total citations
- FWCI
- 193.07
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 41
Citations per year
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Argumentation theory
- Skepticism
- Argument (complex analysis)
- Epistemology
- Sociology
- Science education
- Engineering ethics
- Pedagogy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.