reviewJournal of Applied PsychologyJan 1, 2005Closed access

Effect Size and Power in Assessing Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables Using Multiple Regression: A 30-Year Review.

University of Colorado Denver · Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

The authors conducted a 30-year review (1969-1998) of the size of moderating effects of categorical variables as assessed using multiple regression. The median observed effect size (f(2)) is only .002, but 72% of the moderator tests reviewed had power of .80 or greater to detect a targeted effect conventionally defined as small. Results suggest the need to minimize the influence of artifacts that produce a downward bias in the observed effect size and put into question the use of conventional definitions of moderating effect sizes. As long as an effect has a meaningful impact, the authors advise researchers to conduct a power analysis and plan future research designs on the basis of smaller and more realistic…

Citation impact

1,103
total citations
FWCI
18.34
Percentile
100%
References
75
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Moderation
  • Categorical variable
  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Sample size determination
  • Econometrics
  • Regression analysis
  • Regression
No related works found for this paper.