reviewAnnals of SurgeryAug 1, 2008GREEN OA

A Systematic Review of Skills Transfer After Surgical Simulation Training

Royal Australasian College of Surgeons · The University of Adelaide · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

A systematic search strategy was used to retrieve relevant studies. Inclusion of articles was determined using a predetermined protocol, independent assessment by 2 reviewers, and a final consensus decision. Only studies that reported on the use of simulation-based training for surgical skills training, and the transferability of these skills to the operative setting, were included.

Results

Ten randomized controlled trials and 1 nonrandomized comparative study were included in this review. In most cases, simulation-based training was in addition to normal training programs. Only 1 study compared simulation-based training with patient-based training. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy and colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, participants who received simulation-based training before undergoing patient-based assessment performed better than their counterparts who did not receive previous simulation training, but improvement was not demonstrated for all measured parameters.

Citation impact

615
total citations
FWCI
29.59
Percentile
100%
References
28
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Simulation training
  • Protocol (science)
  • Medical physics
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Training (meteorology)
  • Sigmoidoscopy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.