reviewJournal of Clinical OncologyMar 17, 2009Closed access

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Trials on Safety and Efficacy of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Baird Institute · The University of Sydney

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

Electronic searches identified 21 eligible comparative studies (two randomized and 19 nonrandomized) for inclusion. Two reviewers independently appraised each study. Meta-analysis was performed by combining the results of reported incidence of morbidity and mortality, recurrence, and 5-year mortality rates. The relative risk (RR) was used as a summary statistic.

Results

There were no significant statistical differences between VATS and open lobectomy in terms of postoperative prolonged air leak (P = .71), arrhythmia (P = .86), pneumonia (P = .09), and mortality (P = .49). VATS did not demonstrate any significant difference in locoregional recurrence (P = .24), as compared with the open lobectomy arm, but the data suggested a reduced systemic recurrence rate (P = .03) and an improved 5-year mortality rate of VATS (P = .04). There was no evidence to suggest heterogeneity of trial results. Fourteen studies reported VATS to open lobectomy conversion rate ranging from 0% to 15.7% (median = 8.1%).

Citation impact

734
total citations
FWCI
34.48
Percentile
100%
References
71
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Surgery
  • Lung cancer
  • Meta-analysis
  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • VATS lobectomy
  • Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.