Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review
National Institute of Occupational Health
Abstract
The empirical basis for theories and common wisdom regarding how to improve appropriate use of research evidence in policy decisions is unclear. One source of empirical evidence is interview studies with policy-makers. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence from interview studies of facilitators of, and barriers to, the use of research evidence by health policy-makers.
We searched multiple databases, including Medline, Embase, Sociofile, PsychLit, PAIS, IBSS, IPSA and HealthStar in June 2000, hand-searched key journals and personally contacted investigators. We included interview studies with health policy-makers that covered their perceptions of the use of research evidence in health policy decisions at a national, regional or organisational level. Two reviewers independently assessed the relevance of retrieved articles, described the methods of included studies and extracted data that were summarised in tables and analysed qualitatively.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 35.36
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 27
Authors
4Topics & keywords
- Relevance (law)
- MEDLINE
- Inclusion (mineral)
- Empirical evidence
- Qualitative research
- Psychology
- Empirical research
- Health policy
- Reduced inequalities