reviewArchives of Internal MedicineMar 13, 2006Closed access

The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision Makers

National Institutes of Health · Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Clinicians currently rely on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates to make end-of-life treatment decisions for incapacitated patients. Surrogates are instructed to use the substituted judgment standard, which directs them to make the treatment decision that the patient would have made if he or she were capacitated. However, commentators have questioned the accuracy with which surrogates predict patients' treatment preferences.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and manuscript references, to identify published studies that provide empirical data on how accurately surrogates predict patients' treatment preferences and on the efficacy of commonly proposed methods to improve surrogate accuracy. Two of us (D.I.S. and D.W.) reviewed all articles and extracted data on the hypothetical scenarios used to assess surrogate accuracy and the percentage of agreement between patients and surrogates.

No related works found for this paper.

Funding