Abstract

Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge communities vet and self‐regulate their work. Despite vocal concerns, a closer look at the empirical and methodological limitations of research on bias raises questions about the existence and extent of many hypothesized forms of bias. In addition, the notion of bias is predicated on an implicit ideal that, once articulated, raises questions about the normative implications of research on bias in peer review. This review provides a brief description of the function, history, and scope of peer review; articulates and critiques the conception of…

Citation impact

961
total citations
FWCI
30.13
Percentile
100%
References
196
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Normative
  • Status quo bias
  • Legitimacy
  • Status quo
  • Peer review
  • Function (biology)
  • Scope (computer science)
  • Empirical research
No related works found for this paper.

Funding