articleNew England Journal of MedicineAug 20, 2003BRONZE OA

A Comparison of Coronary Angioplasty with Fibrinolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Aarhus University Hospital · Aalborg University Hospital · +6 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

For the treatment of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, primary angioplasty is considered superior to fibrinolysis for patients who are admitted to hospitals with angioplasty facilities. Whether this benefit is maintained for patients who require transportation from a community hospital to a center where invasive treatment is available is uncertain.

Methods

We randomly assigned 1572 patients with acute myocardial infarction to treatment with angioplasty or accelerated treatment with intravenous alteplase; 1129 patients were enrolled at 24 referral hospitals and 443 patients at 5 invasive-treatment centers. The primary study end point was a composite of death, clinical evidence of reinfarction, or disabling stroke at 30 days.

Citation impact

1,314
total citations
FWCI
63.98
Percentile
100%
References
20
Citations per year

Authors

18

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Angioplasty
  • Fibrinolysis
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Cardiology
  • Internal medicine
  • Thrombolysis
  • Stroke (engine)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.