reviewBritish Journal of General PracticeFeb 26, 2010BRONZE OA

Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review

University of Oxford · Primary Health Care

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The UK-based General Practice Research Database (GPRD) is a valuable source of longitudinal primary care records and is increasingly used for epidemiological research.

Aim

To conduct a systematic review of the literature on accuracy and completeness of diagnostic coding in the GPRD. DESIGN OF STUDY: Systematic review. METHOD: Six electronic databases were searched using search terms relating to the GPRD, in association with terms synonymous with validity, accuracy, concordance, and recording. A positive predictive value was calculated for each diagnosis that considered a comparison with a gold standard. Studies were also considered that compared the GPRD with other databases and national statistics.

Citation impact

689
total citations
FWCI
91.55
Percentile
100%
References
58
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Concordance
  • Medical diagnosis
  • Medicine
  • Gold standard (test)
  • Coding (social sciences)
  • Diagnosis code
  • Medical record
  • Systematic review
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding