articleNew England Journal of MedicineMar 21, 2002BRONZE OA

Amiodarone as Compared with Lidocaine for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation

St. Michael's Hospital · St Michael’s Hospital · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Lidocaine has been the initial antiarrhythmic drug treatment recommended for patients with ventricular fibrillation that is resistant to conversion by defibrillator shocks. We performed a randomized trial comparing intravenous lidocaine with intravenous amiodarone as an adjunct to defibrillation in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods

Patients were enrolled if they had out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation resistant to three shocks, intravenous epinephrine, and a further shock; or if they had recurrent ventricular fibrillation after initially successful defibrillation. They were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive intravenous amiodarone plus lidocaine placebo or intravenous lidocaine plus amiodarone placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who survived to be admitted to the hospital.

Citation impact

817
total citations
FWCI
44.41
Percentile
100%
References
21
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Amiodarone
  • Lidocaine
  • Defibrillation
  • Ventricular fibrillation
  • Anesthesia
  • Placebo
  • Shock (circulatory)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.