articleNew England Journal of MedicineApr 2, 2015BRONZE OA

A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

Sahlgrenska University Hospital · University Medical Center · +8 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is widely used. However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outcomes in rectal cancer is lacking. A trial was designed to compare 3-year rates of cancer recurrence in the pelvic or perineal area (locoregional recurrence) and survival after laparoscopic and open resection of rectal cancer.

Methods

In this international trial conducted in 30 hospitals, we randomly assigned patients with a solitary adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 15 cm of the anal verge, not invading adjacent tissues, and without distant metastases to undergo either laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point was locoregional recurrence 3 years after the index surgery. Secondary end points included disease-free and overall survival.

No related works found for this paper.

Funding