The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers
Indexed incrossref
Abstract
Universities increasingly expect students to publish during a PhD candidature because it benefits the candidate, supervisor, institution, and wider community. Here, we describe a method successfully used by early-career researchers including PhD candidates to undertake and publish literature reviews – a challenge for researchers new to a field. Our method allows researchers new to a field to systematically analyse existing academic literature to produce a structured quantitative summary of the field. This method is a more straightforward and systematic approach than the traditional ‘narrative method’ common to many student theses. When published, this type of review can also complement existing narrative…
Citation impact
1,297
total citations
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 28
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Publication
- Publishing
- Field (mathematics)
- Systematic review
- Narrative
- Narrative review
- Complement (music)
- Computer science
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.