articleAnnals of SurgeryJan 17, 2007GREEN OA

Anastomotic Leaks After Intestinal Anastomosis

University of Vermont

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

A prospective database of two colorectal surgeons was reviewed over a 10-year period (1995-2004). The incidence of leak by surgical site, timing of diagnosis, method of detection, and treatment was noted. Complications were entered prospectively by a nurse practitioner directly involved in patient care. Standardized criteria for diagnosis were used. A logistic regression model was used to discriminate statistical variation.

Results

A total of 1223 patients underwent resection and anastomosis during the study period. Mean age was 59.1 years. Leaks occurred in 33 patients (2.7%). Diagnosis was made a mean of 12.7 days postoperatively, including four beyond 30 days (12.1%). There was no difference in leak rate by surgeon (3.6% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.08). The leak rate was similar by surgical site except for a markedly increased leak rate with ileorectal anastomosis (P = 0.001). Twelve leaks were diagnosed clinically versus 21 radiographically. Contrast enema correctly identified only 4 of 10 leaks, whereas CT correctly identified 17 of 19. A total of 14 of 33 (42%) patients had their leak diagnosed only after readmission. Fifteen patients required fecal diversion, whereas 18 could be managed nonoperatively.

Citation impact

641
total citations
FWCI
9.49
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Anastomosis
  • Leak
  • Surgery
  • Incidence (geometry)
  • Prospective cohort study
  • Complication
  • Retrospective cohort study
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.