articleNeurosurgeryOct 1, 2008Closed access

THE EFFECTS OF SPINAL CORD STIMULATION IN NEUROPATHIC PAIN ARE SUSTAINED

Regina General Hospital · Phillips Exeter Academy · +12 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

After randomizing 100 failed back surgery syndrome patients to receive spinal cord stimulation (SCS) plus conventional medical management (CMM) or CMM alone, the results of the 6-month Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial of the Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (i.e., PROCESS) showed that SCS offered superior pain relief, health-related quality of life, and functional capacity. Because the rate of crossover favoring SCS beyond 6 months would bias a long-term randomized group comparison, we present all outcomes in patients who continued SCS from randomization to 24 months and, for illustrative purposes, the primary outcome (>50% leg pain relief) per randomization and final treatment.

Methods

Patients provided data on pain, quality of life, function, pain medication use, treatment satisfaction, and employment status. Investigators documented adverse events. Data analysis included inferential comparisons and multivariate regression analyses.

Citation impact

627
total citations
FWCI
22.70
Percentile
100%
References
33
Citations per year

Authors

14

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Randomization
  • Quality of life (healthcare)
  • Anesthesia
  • Adverse effect
  • Surgery
  • Physical therapy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Decent work and economic growth
No related works found for this paper.