articleResearch in Nursing & HealthJan 1, 2006GREEN OA

The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations

Humana (United States) · Griffith University · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Scale developers often provide evidence of content validity by computing a content validity index (CVI), using ratings of item relevance by content experts. We analyzed how nurse researchers have defined and calculated the CVI, and found considerable consistency for item-level CVIs (I-CVIs). However, there are two alternative, but unacknowledged, methods of computing the scale-level index (S-CVI). One method requires universal agreement among experts, but a less conservative method averages the item-level CVIs. Using backward inference with a purposive sample of scale development studies, we found that both methods are being used by nurse researchers, although it was not always possible to infer the…

Citation impact

6,299
total citations
FWCI
64.48
Percentile
100%
References
31
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Content validity
  • Scale (ratio)
  • Content (measure theory)
  • Index (typography)
  • Consistency (knowledge bases)
  • Relevance (law)
  • Psychology
  • Inference
No related works found for this paper.