The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations
Humana (United States) · Griffith University · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Scale developers often provide evidence of content validity by computing a content validity index (CVI), using ratings of item relevance by content experts. We analyzed how nurse researchers have defined and calculated the CVI, and found considerable consistency for item-level CVIs (I-CVIs). However, there are two alternative, but unacknowledged, methods of computing the scale-level index (S-CVI). One method requires universal agreement among experts, but a less conservative method averages the item-level CVIs. Using backward inference with a purposive sample of scale development studies, we found that both methods are being used by nurse researchers, although it was not always possible to infer the…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 64.48
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 31
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Content validity
- Scale (ratio)
- Content (measure theory)
- Index (typography)
- Consistency (knowledge bases)
- Relevance (law)
- Psychology
- Inference